CALL NOW FOR A FREE CONSULTATION 702-834-6300

Blog

Can I Take My Kids Out Of State?

Posted by David Jacks | Nov 10, 2024

Taking Your Children Out of State: Vacation vs. Relocation Under Nevada Law

In family law, particularly custody cases, parents often ask whether they are allowed to take their children out of state. The answer depends on the purpose of the travel: a brief vacation or an intention to relocate permanently. The Nevada legal system has specific guidelines for each scenario, ensuring the best interests of the child are maintained and both parents' rights are respected. This article will examine the legal distinctions between taking your children on an out-of-state vacation versus moving with them and the Nevada laws governing these situations.

1. Understanding Custodial Rights and Permissions

In Nevada, whether you can legally take your children out of state often depends on the custody arrangement outlined in your divorce decree or custodial agreement. Nevada courts, guided by NRS 125C, prioritize maintaining a balanced relationship with both parents. The courts also aim to prevent one parent from limiting the other's access to their children without just cause. Understanding how custodial rights influence your ability to take children out of state is essential, whether for a short trip or a permanent move.

a. Legal Custody vs. Physical Custody

• Legal Custody grants parents the right to make significant decisions about their child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious choices. This is often shared between parents in Nevada, leading to what is known as “joint legal custody.”

• Physical Custody determines where the child primarily resides. Nevada courts may award joint physical custody (where the child spends significant time with both parents) or primary physical custody to one parent (where the child spends most time with one parent).

Each parent's custodial rights directly impacts their ability to take the child out of state.

b. Types of Out-of-State Travel and Permission Requirements

The law differentiates between temporary travel, such as vacations, and permanent relocation. Each requires different permissions, and failure to follow legal guidelines may lead to serious consequences, including contempt of court.

2. Taking Your Children Out of State for Vacation

When one parent wishes to take the children out of state for a vacation, the primary consideration is whether both parents have agreed on the trip, especially if they share joint custody. For short trips, the law generally supports the child's opportunity to experience travel and spend time with each parent outside Nevada, as long as the child returns as scheduled and both parents remain informed.

a. Notification and Permission Requirements for Vacations

1. Notification to the Other Parent: Nevada typically requires the traveling parent to inform the non-traveling parent of any out-of-state trip. This notification should include details such as the destination, duration, accommodation, and emergency contact information.

2. Written Consent (If Applicable): For custodial parents with joint physical custody, it is recommended to obtain written consent from the other parent, especially if the trip involves several days or international travel.

3. Potential Court Involvement: If the other parent objects to the trip and believes it interferes with their custodial time, they may seek a court order to prevent the travel. However, for vacations, Nevada courts usually favor allowing the child to have enriching experiences with each parent, assuming all custodial rights are respected.

3. Relocating with Children Out of State

Permanent relocation with children is significantly more complex than a temporary trip. Nevada law requires that a parent seeking to relocate must either have the other parent's consent or obtain court approval. This requirement aims to balance both parents' rights and the child's need for stability.

a. Consent from the Other Parent

If the non-relocating parent consents to the move, the relocating parent should obtain written agreement, which can then be submitted to the court. This step ensures clarity and prevents future disputes regarding the terms of the relocation.

b. Court Approval and Best Interest Standard

If the non-relocating parent does not consent, the relocating parent must file a motion with the court seeking permission to relocate. Nevada courts rely on the “best interest of the child” standard and evaluate multiple factors when determining whether to allow the relocation. Key considerations include:

1. Reason for Relocation: The relocating parent must demonstrate a legitimate reason for moving, such as a job opportunity, educational benefits, or family support.

2. Impact on Relationship with Non-Relocating Parent: The court examines whether the relocation will severely impact the child's relationship with the non-relocating parent. If the move would hinder regular contact, the court may be hesitant to grant permission.

3. Improvement in Child's Quality of Life: The court considers whether the relocation would improve the child's overall well-being, including access to better schools, extracurricular activities, or a safer environment.

4. Alternative Visitation Arrangements: The relocating parent should propose alternative visitation schedules that would allow the non-relocating parent to maintain a meaningful relationship with the child. These can include extended summer vacations, holiday time, or virtual visits.

4. Relevant Case Law: Harrison v. Harrison

The Nevada Supreme Court case of Harrison v. Harrison serves as a precedent for relocation cases. In this case, the court emphasized the importance of evaluating the child's best interests and assessing the specific circumstances of each case. Harrison v. Harrison highlighted that the moving parent must prove the relocation would benefit the child's quality of life and not unreasonably disrupt the non-relocating parent's access.

This case is frequently referenced when parents seek relocation and provides guidance on the factors that judges consider when determining if relocation is in the child's best interest.

5. Legal Consequences of Unauthorized Relocation

Attempting to relocate a child out of state without permission is a serious legal violation in Nevada. Unauthorized relocation may result in:

• Contempt of Court: The non-relocating parent can file a motion for contempt if the other parent relocates without proper authorization.

• Modification of Custody: The court may modify the existing custody arrangement, potentially reducing the relocating parent's custodial rights.

• Legal Sanctions and Fines: Courts may impose fines or require the relocating parent to pay the other parent's legal fees.

Unauthorized relocation is considered a significant interference with the non-relocating parent's custodial rights, and Nevada courts take such actions seriously.

6. Practical Tips for Parents Considering Out-of-State Travel or Relocation

• Communicate Early: When planning a vacation or considering relocation, open communication with the other parent is essential. Providing full details and giving ample notice can help avoid potential legal conflicts.

• Keep Written Records: Document any agreements, whether regarding vacations or discussions about potential relocation. Written consent and communication records can protect both parents' rights.

• Consult an Attorney: Family law can be complex, and each case is unique. Consulting a legal professional can provide clarity and ensure compliance with Nevada law.

Conclusion

In Nevada, taking your child out of state for a vacation is generally permissible, provided both parents are informed and consent is given where necessary. Relocating, however, requires a more rigorous legal process, as it has lasting implications on both the child and the non-relocating parent. Nevada courts, guided by NRS 125C and cases like Harrison v. Harrison, carefully consider each parent's rights and focus on the best interests of the child when deciding on relocation requests.

Navigating these legal waters can be challenging, and each situation is unique. This blog provides general information and should not be considered legal advice. For tailored guidance, consult with an attorney who can assess your specific circumstances and help protect your rights and the best interests of your child.

Disclaimer: The information provided here is for informational and entertain purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. The outcome of each case depends on its specific facts, and consulting with a qualified attorney is recommended for any legal concerns.

About the Author

David Jacks

David Jacks is a seasoned attorney and founder of The Jacks Law Group, PLLC, in Las Vegas and Henderson, Nevada. Born and raised in Las Vegas, he served as an Animal Care Specialist in the U.S. Army before transitioning to a career in law. He earned his BA in Political Science from UNLV and his JD from Arizona Summit Law School. David’s practice focuses on family law and personal injury cases, including divorce, child custody, and car accidents. He is recognized for his professional excellence and has received numerous awards. David is actively involved in the legal community and various professional associations.

Contact Us Today

The Jacks Law Group is committed to answering your questions about Family and Personal Injury law issues in Henderson, NV.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu